NYSE: CLOSED
TSE: CLOSED
LSE: CLOSED
HKE: CLOSED
NSE: CLOSED
BM&F: CLOSED
ASX: CLOSED
FWB: CLOSED
MOEX: CLOSED
JSE: CLOSED
DIFX: CLOSED
SSE: CLOSED
NZSX: CLOSED
TSX: CLOSED
SGX: CLOSED
NYSE: CLOSED
TSE: CLOSED
LSE: CLOSED
HKE: CLOSED
NSE: CLOSED
BM&F: CLOSED
ASX: CLOSED
FWB: CLOSED
MOEX: CLOSED
JSE: CLOSED
DIFX: CLOSED
SSE: CLOSED
NZSX: CLOSED
TSX: CLOSED
SGX: CLOSED

Jeremy Grantham Assesses Long-Term Threats Through an Investor Lens

Renowned investor Jeremy Grantham assesses threats like excessive market risk, chemical pollution rapidly reducing fertility, and expected population declines, arguing investors should account for environmental issues in financial analysis and capital allocation.

Looking past immediate market fluctuations, far-sighted investors must grapple with deeper forces that will shape societies, economies and portfolios in the decades ahead. Renowned investor Jeremy Grantham draws attention to several crucial considerations often overlooked in financial analysis, ranging from pollution impacts to population shifts. Wise investors will incorporate these issues, even where uncertainty prevails.

Grantham highlights the perils of rampant chemical pollution, with insect biomass declining precipitously across habitats. Research links these chemical exposures to plummeting human sperm counts and fertility rates as well. Resulting in demographic impacts that may prove more financially destabilizing than modeled. At the same time, technologies combating this pollution offer upside potential.

Expected global population declines, especially in developed countries, also carry underappreciated opportunities and risks. Slower growth eases resource constraints, but also pressures economic expansion and debt repayment capabilities if fewer working-age citizens shoulder the burden. Financial assets and sectors assuming steady demographic trends face reckoning.

Most alarmingly, Grantham warns pollution and population shifts represent “real threat[s] to the species” that could cascade into civilizational threats on current trajectories. He argues investors allocating capital can influence outcomes by accounting for environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in asset management rather than pursuing unfettered short-term profits. Ultimately, the difference between disastrous societal outcomes and sustainable futures traces back to human decisions in the coming years that investors help shape.

Incorporating these considerations expands investor perspective beyond narrow financial metrics. While uncertainty and complexity still shroud many issues, increased comprehension better calibrates risk analysis and opportunity assessment. Perhaps more crucially, integrating systemic issues awakens investor conscience regarding indirect exposures and ethical obligations — a perspective vital to ameliorating worst-case scenarios. Grantham’s insight anchors investors firmly in realities beyond spreadsheets.

Assessing Long-Term Threats Through an Investor Lens

In a wide-ranging discussion, renowned investor Jeremy Grantham covers topics critical for investors to consider regarding future global threats. With decades of experience analyzing markets and corporations, Grantham brings unique insight into assessing climate change, chemical pollution, population shifts and other crucial issues. His objective assessment of risks and opportunities should catch the attention of any investor concerned about their portfolio's resilience.

Commodity Price Reversals Signal Resource Constraints

Grantham highlights a notable shift occurring in commodity prices after a century of declines. He tracks a GMO index encompassing 33 major commodities, ranging from metals to energy resources. As Grantham details, "Those 33 declined by 70% in the 20th century...the index that had gone from 100 to 30, is back over 90. It has tripled since 2022." This reversal marks a seismic shift with profound investing implications.

Driving home the point, Grantham notes, "This is not the trend that we all grew up on. This is a new world in which we are going to have to come to terms with the finiteness of almost everything." The prior declines enabled enormous economic expansion and productivity growth as input costs steadily dropped. But the index bottomed in 2002 as China's breakneck development put unprecedented strain on global resources. Grantham references China's "amazing and accelerating growth in China's demand for important resources. For the last 4 years, they accelerated to double-digit." This pressure, alongside plateauing supplies, has reversed the prevailing tailwind.

As Grantham describes, the 20th-century commodity index decline stemmed from the "massive help in getting rich" as average commodity input prices fell 70%. Oil and metals became more affordable even as demand escalated. The "rise of the machines" and hydrocarbon-powered extraction industries accessed previously unviable reserves. Only the OPEC oil shocks briefly interrupted the overarching downward trajectory in commodity prices.

Today commodity indexes sit near triple 2002 lows and the longer-term trend points upward. While demand continues growing, supplies struggle to keep pace after the easiest deposits have been tapped. Grantham notes, "There are no reserves anymore. China pretty well bled the last great mines of these important, but rare metals." Unlike past cycles, prices now react to shortages rather than surplus-induced gluts. With resources fundamental to economic activity repricing after a century of declines, implications for investors and societies prove far-reaching.

On Markets and Valuations

Grantham makes clear his view that markets are substantially overvalued relative to historical norms: "I believe if you look at the scale of it, the biggest, most significant crazy behavior in recorded history of the US stock market." He points to indicators like ultra-high price-to-earnings ratios and the explosion of speculative activity around meme stocks as signals of a market disconnect. Grantham expects a reversion to long-term valuation trends, likely through a burst bubble and resulting economic impacts: "...they nearly always take longer than people think because they're so powerful and they didn't get there by accident. They were driven by some underlying important fundamentals." Wise investors should account for this likelihood in their analysis.

Elaborating further, Grantham notes current market risk exceeds that of past bubbles: "Everything is critical to what is a bubble, a two sigma. And in the developed world, they all went back to trend, to the previous trend before the bubble started." He sees a "very dangerous set" of conditions including geopolitical tensions between major powers like China and Russia, breakdowns in international cooperation and trade, and critical resource constraints. These could critically intensify economic shocks when market corrections occur. With asset valuations stretched well past historical limits already, the room for error is slim.

Investors must also factor in how monetary policy shifts could undermine markets. As Grantham explains, "When you lower the rates, you also make debt available to people who can handle borrowing. That is to say private equity and hedge funds and leverage in general, that is a windfall gain." Continued easy money policies provide a subsidy for financial engineering and speculative activity that masks underlying weakness. Deteriorating fundamentals portend trouble on the horizon.

On Pollution Impacts

Even more alarming than market risk, Grantham highlights the severe threats posed by rampant pollution, especially from chemicals: "What we have done is we have created a world which is hostile to life in almost every form, including our own." He notes insect biomass is down 50-75%, along with declines in sperm counts and fertility rates that could devastate human population levels: "It seems that we're going out of business. At this rate 20, 30, 40 years and we hit the fan, bang. And it scrambles. Everything we're obsessing about is affected by this shocking drop in fertility."

Though climate change grabs headlines, chemical impacts could overwhelm societies first. Grantham issues a stark warning: "My conclusion is if we do not end up banning most chemicals, including plastics, we will go out of business...the loss of a reasonably stable global civilization that we may have pockets and so on here and there. But what we know of as a reasonably acceptable life will be gone." The breadth of the chemical exposure risks, from pesticides to everyday plastics, cover immense ground. Investors should hedge against direct chemical exposure in holdings as well as indirect ecosystem damage rippling through supply chains.

Analyzing the evidence, Grantham notes, "If you look at human sperm count, it's dropping at the same rate of insects between 1.5%, 2% a year." He references research attributing "maybe half of all the damage done by chemicals to humans" to "pesticides on fruit and vegetables eaten by pregnant women." Grantham argues chemical impacts constitute "a real threat to the species" that requires urgent action across sectors. Investors have a key role to play in allocating capital to reduce pollution footprints in areas like agriculture, transportation, energy and materials production.

As Grantham concludes, "We measure a great loss of insects...we may be teetering on the edge of our destruction and we just don't know it, because no one has ever funded insect research and you could take all our money, throw it at any one of these things, and it would still be a drop in the bucket." Investors should consider not just direct holdings creating chemical risks, but also fund research elucidating wider ecosystem damage. There remains great uncertainty around intensely complex system interactions.

On Population Decline

While pollution presents dangers, Grantham also sees opportunities in expected population reduction. He notes "...the population profile shifting fairly violently by any population standard, we have never seen a shift of this magnitude going from rapid growth to rapid decline in a 30-year window." Combined with technology gains, lower populations could ease resource constraints enough for societies to transition toward sustainability.

Critical factors driving declines include female education levels, postponed pregnancy, toxicity interfering with fertility, and surprisingly, declining interest in sexual activity likely tied to chemical exposure. Grantham observes, "It cuts right across all the other things we're working on...If our population is going to turn out to be substantially less than the low estimate of the UN by 2100 in just 70 years, and then much less by 2200, the main things we have to worry about maybe is holding society together."

Consider South Korea where "last year...[the] fertility rate [was] 0.8...At 0.8 it means in 3 generations, a hundred years, your baby cohort will be 6.5% of what it is today. Basically, you're out of business." Japan faces similar pressures. Investors should model different population scenarios – from UN forecasts to more extreme declines – and carefully assess impacts on sectors tied to consumption, housing markets, labor force growth and innovation.

Rapid population shifts also raise risks around economic shocks and social stability: "The stress on society and economy will be pretty high...It would affect everything else including the paying back of debt." With fewer working-age citizens available to service debts, demands on individual workers may skyrocket: "If we take a long time [on carbon reduction] and we probably will, if we peak and at 550 one day and the population in terms of the workers has already halved, they have twice the burden. And then as they pay for it over a hundred years, it halves again. By the end, they've quadrupled that burden. And it's a pretty big burden anyway." Investors should account for such demographic headwinds in debt exposure and holdings linked to discretionary purchases.

Grantham's View of Economists and Hedge Fund Managers

Grantham has a very critical view of mainstream economists and the direction of the field.

"The establishment since then basically wasted in this efficient market, rational expectation nonsense building models to be neat and mathematical and show their physics envy, but totally useless."

"Everything you read from mainstream economics ignores the role of energy and resources. You make a loaf of bread with capital and labor with the oven and with the worker, with the great paddle to stick it in the oven. You do not apparently need any wheat and you don't apparently need any heat. It is absolutely a laughable state of affairs."

"Kenneth Boulding, who started as a typical mainstream economist and then resigned when he was about 50 because he found economics totally useless as in the direction it was heading. And in my opinion, he's right."

Overall, Grantham sees modern academic economics as overly focused on elegant mathematical models disconnected from reality and the role of fundamental inputs like energy and resources. He believes this obsession with theory over practicality has led the field astray into irrelevance and calls for a major redirection. Grantham has a very negative view of mainstream economists, seeing the field as wasting decades on useless theories disconnected from reality.

However, his perspective on hedge fund managers seems more mixed:

  • He expresses surprise that so few hedge fund managers recognize critical issues like resource constraints and climate change: "I am shocked over the last 30 years at how little interest my fellow financial types have throughout the industry in these issues on which our long-term wellbeing depends."
  • But he doesn't lump all hedge funds together, noting exceptions and stating "some [hedge fund managers] are unbelievably smart."
  • He critiques trends like increased use of leverage and speculation as enriching hedge fund managers at the expense of social value creation. Practices like share buybacks also contribute to inequality.
  • Yet Grantham still sees virtues in areas like venture capital investing, which channels funds to innovative companies. This can drive progress on environmental issues.

Overall, while Grantham levies criticism against mainstream economics, he directs his harshest indictments at general investor disinterest in long-term threats. Hedge funds reflect this, but with bright spots like green tech investing demonstrating a better path forward. He seems to separate productive capital allocation from predatory financial engineering.

Key Investor Actions

  • Account for overstretched asset valuations and high-market risk
  • Factor in direct chemical pollution impacts on health and ecosystems
  • Model potential population declines, especially in developed nations
  • Invest in technologies combating pollution issues and resource constraints
  • Support carbon taxes and shifts toward circular economic models
  • Hedge debt exposure given demographic shifts and debt burdens
  • Fund research clarifying complex chemical and ecological damage

In Grantham's view, the compounded threats from markets, pollution, population, and environment may cascade in highly disruptive ways without thoughtful intervention. However, he remains “extremely optimistic” about technologies like renewable energy, geothermal solutions and regenerative agriculture buying the necessary time if deployed skillfully. Cloud brightening, controversial geo-engineering approaches, and innovations enabling hydrogen and fusion energy constitute other promising paths.

Likewise, global cooperation and cultural attitudes prioritizing sustainability can still advance enough to maintain global civilization. But Grantham cautions, “We are going to make it...if we are slightly more to the enlightened side than the unenlightened side, where we really exist well within a range of success and failure.” Avoiding the most dire scenarios hangs on a knife's edge of human decisions in coming years.

Investors play a crucial role in allocating capital to drive innovation and shape economies. By considering the long-term risks Grantham outlines with patience and foresight, they can contribute to positive outcomes. As stewards of tremendous resources, their priorities and signaling must evolve beyond short-term profits. Integrating environmental social governance factors directly into asset management and ownership choices provides a starting point. But a much deeper transformation awaits.


Bannerman Energy

Bannerman Energy is an Australian uranium development company focused on advancing its flagship 3.5Mlb pa open pit uranium project in Namibia, a major global uranium producer. Bannerman is currently working on Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) and financing for the Namibia project. The company also holds a significant 41.8% stake in Namibia Critical Metals, developer of the large-scale Lofdal heavy rare earths project in Namibia, one of only a few heavy rare earth deposits outside China.

Ur-Energy

Ur-Energy is a U.S. uranium mining company well positioned to benefit from rising uranium prices driven by growing demand for nuclear power. Within-situ recovery operations in Wyoming, Ur-Energy has been producing from its Lost Creek facility since 2013 and can now effectively double licensed annual production capacity to 2 million pounds with its permitted Shirley Basin project. With over $70 million in cash, Ur-Energy is funded to ramp up low-cost production from its Wyoming hub as it restarts wellfield construction. The company utilizes mining methods with a light environmental footprint and advancing next-generation technologies to further reduce costs. If uranium prices continue strengthening, Ur-Energy offers leverage as an experienced producer with scalable, permitted projects in a rising uranium market.

Global Atomic

Global Atomic Corporation is a publicly traded company with two main divisions - a Uranium Division that is developing the large, high-grade Dasa uranium project in Niger, which is now fully permitted with excavation underway, and a Base Metals Division that holds a 49%stake in a zinc production joint venture in Turkey operated by Befesa. The joint venture recycles Electric Arc Furnace Dust to produce zinc oxide concentrate sold to zinc smelters globally. Global Atomic’s unique combination of uranium production and cash-flowing zinc operations positions it well for growth.

Energy Fuels

Energy Fuels is the largest uranium and advanced rare earth element producer in the United States. The company has significant uranium production capacity and long-term sales contracts with U.S. nuclear utilities that it expects to fulfil starting in 2023-2024. Energy Fuels is also quickly moving to establish a domestic rare earth element supply chain, with plans to produce high-value separated REE oxides by late 2023 or early 2024. The company additionally produces vanadium when conditions warrant, recycles materials to recover uranium, vanadium and medical isotopes, and is advancing capabilities for medical isotope production. Overall, Energy Fuels is a major U.S. producer of strategic minerals like uranium and rare earth elements that are critical for energy, technology, and medical applications.

American Lithium

American Lithium is developing large-scale lithium projects in Nevada and Peru as well as one of the world's biggest uranium projects, with the goal of playing a major role in the transition to sustainable energy. The company's assets are the advanced-stage TLC lithium project in Nevada and the Falchanilithium project in Peru, which have robust preliminary economic assessments. American Lithium also owns the Macusani uranium project in Peru, which has seen significant historical development. With assets at various stages of pre-feasibility and feasibility studies, American Lithium is positioned to be a major player in lithium and uranium mining.

Deep Yellow

Deep Yellow has systematically built a portfolio of high-quality uranium assets to establish a significant production platform and realize its vision of becoming a leading international uranium mining company. With its experienced leadership team at the helm, Deep Yellow has set its sights on diversified production of over 10 million pounds per year, capitalizing on forecast supply squeezes. Its flagship Tumas mine in Namibia already claims one of the world's largest undeveloped uranium deposits as Deep Yellow advances toward a 2024 construction decision. Meanwhile, its Mulga Rock project in Western Australia progresses through feasibility studies for targeted development. Beyond existing core assets, Deep Yellow has accumulated extensive exploration ground at two prime locations in Namibia and Australia's Northern Territory through strategic acquisitions. These prospects provide substantial opportunities for unlocking further discoveries to continually expand its project pipeline over time. As energy security needs escalate globally, Deep Yellow stands ready to deliver the reliable uranium production that transitioning electricity grids urgently demand. With its production timeline aligned with major forecast supply deficits, Deep Yellow aims to cement itself as the go-to uranium supplier of choice for nuclear utilities worldwide seeking security and diversity of supply. Backed by disciplined leadership, Deep Yellow represents an emerging industry force promising investors exposure to the full lifecycle of value creation across resource discovery, project development and multi-decade uranium production. By targeting low-cost mining jurisdictions, adopting proven processing technologies and securing key infrastructure advantages, Deep Yellow has systematically built itself to deliver sustainable investor windfalls as the uranium bull market unfolds.

Baselode Energy

Baselode Energy is a Canadian uranium exploration company focused on the Athabasca Basin area in northern Saskatchewan. The company controls over 264,000 hectares of land that is free of any option agreements or underlying royalties. In September 2021, Baselode discovered the near-surface ACKIO uranium prospect on its exploration properties. The ACKIO prospect measures over 375 meters long and over 150 meters wide, with at least 9 separate uranium mineralized zones. Mineralization starts as shallow as 28 meters and 32 meters beneath the surface, extending down approximately 300 meters depth, with most mineralization occurring in the top 120 meters. The ACKIO prospect remains open at depth and to the north, south and east for further expansion. Baselode's exploration strategy centers on discovering high-grade uranium deposits outside of the Athabasca Basin near the surface in basement rocks. The company uses innovative and established geophysical survey methods to identify prospective shallow drill targets for high-grade uranium mineralization related to underlying structural controls. This technique has led Baselode to the discovery of the ACKIO prospect.

Nucelar Fuels
Nuclear Fuels Inc. is a Canadian uranium exploration company focused on in-situ recovery (ISR) projects in Wyoming and other proven jurisdictions globally. The company's priority asset is the Kaycee project in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. This project has historical uranium resources distributed along a 33-mile mineralized trend with over 110 miles of mapped roll fronts. The property has been drilled extensively with over 3,800 historical drill holes. Nuclear Fuels has consolidated control of the Kaycee district, acquiring multiple historical uranium deposits and exploration targets. This positions the company to potentially advance the project portfolio into production. Beyond Kaycee, Nuclear Fuels plans to leverage its technical expertise to explore additional uranium properties and opportunities in established mining districts globally. Through aggressive exploration and consolidation of historical resources, the company aims to develop a pipeline of projects, prioritizing those that can be fast-tracked to production using the in-situ recovery mining method.

ISOEnergy
IsoEnergy is a Canadian uranium exploration and development company with projects focused in the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan. The company's flagship property is the Larocque East project in the eastern Athabasca Basin. This project hosts the high-grade Hurricane uranium deposit, which has the highest grade Indicated uranium resource globally. In addition to its exploration projects, IsoEnergy owns several permitted, past-producing uranium and vanadium mines in Utah. These mines are currently on standby but can be rapidly restarted to position IsoEnergy as a near-term uranium producer. The company has a toll milling agreement in place with Energy Fuels Inc. to process ore from its US projects. Beyond its Canadian and US assets, IsoEnergy holds uranium projects in various stages of exploration and development in Australia and Argentina. This diversified portfolio provides leverage to rising uranium prices across different jurisdictions. The company is advancing its Athabasca Basin projects while continuing the exploration on its global assets to drive future production growth.

Atha Energy

ATHA Offers Leveraged Exposure to World-Class Uranium Districts Athabasca Uranium Inc. (ATHA) provides investors with targeted leverage to potentially significant uranium discoveries across some of the world’s most prolific regions for new supply. As a focused mineral exploration company, ATHA has methodically accumulated the single largest exploration package covering the renowned Athabasca Basin. Spanning over 6 million acres, their claims provide unrivalled exposure to this district which has historically produced high-grade uranium deposits. Additionally, ATHA holds extensive prospective ground in the similarly uranium-rich Thelon Basin. Between these two core holdings in prime Canadian uranium provinces, the company has positioned itself amongst acreage with a proven exploration upside. Importantly, a subset of ATHA’s Athabasca land package involves a 10% carried interest in claims operated by sector leaders NexGen Energy and IsoEnergy. With ATHA carried through key exploratory expenditures, this allows leveraged participation alongside seasoned management advancing projects in the basin. For investors, ATHA brings focused leverage to maximizing discovery potential across districts that have delivered huge economic uranium resources. As sentiment improves around uncovered uranium value still unearthed in these Canadian districts, ATHA offers a targeted way to ride the upside. Their vast claim packages in underexplored but prolific terrain form the springboard for potential mineral discovery and resource growth in the coming bull cycle.

Analyst's Notes

Institutional-grade mining analysis available for free. Access all of our "Analyst's Notes" series below.
View more

Subscribe to Our Channel

Subscribing to our YouTube channel, you'll be the first to hear about our exclusive interviews, and stay up-to-date with the latest news and insights.
Recommended
Latest
No related articles

Stay Informed

Sign up for our FREE Monthly Newsletter, used by +45,000 investors