Govts' Allocate Billions, Canada Commits 1.5% GDP as EV Sales Growth Drives Battery Metals Demand Increase

Critical minerals sector poised for government-backed development as Western nations deploy unprecedented capital to secure supply chains amid industry restructuring.
- Western governments have fundamentally restructured critical minerals financing through unprecedented capital commitments, with Canada allocating 1.5% of GDP to critical mineral infrastructure and Australia establishing a $4 billion facility, creating non-dilutive funding pathways that transform remote deposit economics as strategic national investments rather than private sector capital requirements.
- Electric vehicle sales grew 24% across major markets while high-purity alumina demand expands 20% annually for semiconductor and battery applications, yet supply chain disruptions intensify as major titanium producers enter administration or strategic reviews and rare earth processing remains concentrated in Chinese facilities, creating structural supply deficits across materials essential to electrification and defense manufacturing.
- Technical innovations eliminate billion-dollar capital barriers through proven metallurgical breakthroughs, including hydrometallurgical processing that bypasses energy-intensive smelting stages, concentrate-splitting technology that removes smelter requirements, and flotation processes demonstrating 89-95% recovery rates, fundamentally improving project economics while enabling production of materials previously considered economically unrecoverable.
- Advanced-stage projects with completed metallurgical testwork, third-party validation from major mining companies, and 30,000+ meters of historical drilling are positioned to access Major Project Status designations that accelerate permitting timelines and unlock export finance mechanisms, reducing development risk through government backing while established producers retreat from operations facing Chinese price competition and tariff responses.
- Multiple near-term catalysts through 2026 include economic study completions, pilot plant commissioning, government funding announcements, and strategic partnership formations, with companies maintaining 18-24 month cash runways creating compressed development timelines that contrast sharply with traditional 5-10 year junior mining cycles and provide entry points before production decisions drive substantial rerating.
The critical minerals thesis rests on supply-demand imbalances across materials essential to electrification, defense manufacturing, and advanced technology production. From titanium in aerospace components to rare earths in permanent magnets, from high-purity alumina in semiconductor manufacturing to copper in electrical infrastructure, Western governments have identified strategic vulnerabilities and are deploying capital to address them. Projects that align with these priorities—demonstrating scale, technical validation, and development timelines—are positioned to access funding mechanisms unavailable to previous mining cycles.
Government Support Mechanisms Create New Development Pathways
Canada's commitment to allocate 1.5% of its 5% GDP defense spending specifically to critical mineral projects and associated infrastructure represents what Nicholas Holthouse, CEO of Mont Royal Resources, calls a paradigm shift in how Western governments approach resource security. This policy environment favors advanced-stage projects with proven resources in stable jurisdictions. As Holthouse observes regarding Canada's framework:
"Getting that sort of all-important infrastructure piece in place is key. There's no two ways about that. We're about 200-300 km north of Schefferville, which is essentially at the end of the rail line. So there is a road that needs to be built."
The infrastructure challenge that would traditionally render remote projects economically unviable becomes addressable when governments view access roads, power transmission, and transportation corridors as strategic investments rather than private sector burdens. Holthouse emphasizes the current opportunity:
"There's no better time to go and do that than now. There's a lot of pressure in the system and we need to take advantage of this moment in time."
Interview with Nicholas Holthouse, CEO & Peter Ruse, Head of Corporate Development, Mont Royal Resources
Australia's $4 billion Critical Minerals Facility provides similar support mechanisms. Empire Metals Managing Director Shaun Bunn has intensified engagement with these funding pathways as the company maintains active dialogue with the Australian export finance group and the critical minerals office in Canberra, positioning its Pitfield titanium project—with a maiden resource estimate of 2.2 billion tons at just over 5% TiO2—to access government capital for development.
"We've been having a lot of conversations with groups that are really exposed to the supply chain at the moment, groups like Boeing, groups like the Department of Defense in the US, are looking at how they secure long-term supply chains for the metal," Bunn states.
Mark Selby of Canada Nickel highlights how this support extends beyond direct funding to create floor prices and margin protection:
"This whole floor price scenario that we're seeing at the moment, the government support that we're seeing at the moment is really starting to fatten up that value chain."
Canada Nickel's Crawford project demonstrates the economic scale that attracts government attention: $70 billion in GDP impact across a 40-year operational life and $15 billion in direct and indirect tax revenue generation across all government levels.
In Mongolia, the mining industry has seen substantial infrastructure improvements and legal framework maturation, as Asian Battery Metals' Managing Director Gan-Ochir Zunduisuren Ochir notes the comprehensive regulatory framework has been"witnessed by the development of median to large size mining operations:
“Over the last 15 years almost 20 to 30 new mines opened up. So it's almost two new mines every year."
"There are a number of mines built in Mongolia over the last 15 years. Some of them funded by international financial institutions, some of them funded by domestic banks, some of them funded by Chinese institutions".
Industry Restructuring Creates Market Entry Opportunities
Electric vehicle demand continues demonstrating robust expansion despite persistent market skepticism. Canada Nickel's Selby reports:
"Year-to-date through September 2025, global EV sales across China, Europe, and North America increased 24%, with regional growth rates of 32%, 24%, and 11% respectively."
For North American nickel demand specifically, this translates to an additional 300,000-400,000 tons of nickel requirement for high-nickel batteries.
As Selby notes: "In North America, where we drive big cars, big trucks, big SUVs, you're going to need nickel batteries, and to date, almost all of the battery plant additions that are still being built are all high nickel NMC chemistries."
The global titanium industry provides perhaps the clearest example of how supply chain disruption creates openings for new producers. Empire Metals' Bunn frames the current environment:
"The titanium industry is going through a complete restructuring. It's in disarray, and I see that as an opportunity, not a threat."
Recent developments include Venator placing UK operations into administration and listing assets for sale, Rio Tinto's new CEO putting the entire titanium division under strategic review, and Iluka suspending operations at its Cataby mine while shutting portions of its synthetic rutile train. These disruptions stem from Chinese price competition and subsequent tariff responses that have rendered established operations economically challenged.
Empire Metal's approach is a technical innovation that bypasses capital-intensive conventional processing.
As Bunn explains: "We are developing a flowsheet that will clearly be, once it's mapped out, a lower cost alternative to 90% of the world's world's supply chain."
Interview with Shaun Bunn, MD of Empire Metals
The hydrometallurgical pathway eliminates smelting, synthetic rutile kilns, and high-temperature chlorination—stages that consume enormous energy and generate significant waste in conventional operations.
Similarly, NexMetals Mining solved critical metallurgical challenges that plagued previous operators at its Botswana copper-nickel-cobalt assets. CEO Morgan Lekstrom describes the breakthrough:
"We went out, we raised the money, we solved that metallurgy issue, and now we can split the concentrates...I still don't think the markets quite understood how big that was for the company. You've taken a project that required a billion plus dollar smelter to be built to run it to not require that anymore. So you've deleted a huge amount of capex and opex potentially out of the project."
NexMetals Mining's concentrate-splitting technology enables several strategic advantages beyond capital reduction starting with the recovery of cobalt which previous operations could not economically achieve. This metallurgical breakthrough reduces estimated capital intensity to sub-US$500 million per asset versus the US$1+ billion required for integrated operations, fundamentally improving project economics.
Interview with Morgan Lekstrom, CEO of NexMetals Mining
Proven Metallurgy and Technical Validation Reduce Development Risk
Technical de-risking through metallurgical test work and third-party validation provides investors with tangible evidence of project viability before major capital deployment. Mont Royal Resources' Ashram rare earth deposit demonstrates this principle through extensive historical work. Holthouse emphasizes the metallurgical advantage:
"We get incredibly good recoveries. So we're looking at producing a concentrate of around 35-37%. Now that really does give you options in that very early sense."
The project demonstrates flotation kinetics, a critical factor whose absence has derailed numerous other rare earth projects.
Peter Ruse, Head of Corporate Development at Mont Royal Resources, distinguishes Ashram from failed competitors as the company's 30,000+ meters of drilling and proven concentrate production provide the foundation for economic assessments without significant additional exploration expenditure.
As Holthouse states: "There's more than enough exploration work that's been done on this thing for the short while. We don't need to do any more drilling for at least the next two development phases."
Asian Battery Metals received third-party validation through selection for BHP's Xplor accelerator program in 2023, one of seven companies chosen globally from 250 applicants and the only Asian company selected. Managing Director Gan-Ochir Zunduisuren notes:
"BHP provided $500,000 in funding, which the company used to initially discover the project and prove the concept of magmatic mafic intrusion related copper nickel sulfide system."
Subsequent metallurgical test work at the Oval copper-nickel project in Mongolia produced encouraging results, with copper recovery rates of 89-95% and concentrate grades ranging from 18.5-24%.
Interview with Gan-Ochir Zunduisuren, Managing Director of Asian Battery Metals PLC
Impact Minerals' approach to high-purity alumina production centers on proprietary technology that enables modular deployment. The company acquired a 50% interest in HPA production technology, including access to a pilot plant nearing commissioning and a high-purity laboratory. This modular technology allows for smaller plants to be built globally, facilitating easier capital access compared to traditional large-scale operations. Impact Minerals' completed prefeasibility study projects world-class economics: 10,000 tons annual production, a post-tax NPV of approximately A$1.2 billion, and operating costs around $4,500 US per ton.
Near-Term Catalysts: Value Inflection Points
Companies across the critical minerals sector have outlined development timelines that create multiple catalysts through 2026 and beyond.
- Empire Metals' development timeline targets continuous piloting commencement before mid-2026, which will generate product volumes for end-user testing and potential letters of intent. The company's £7 million strategic placement to institutional investors, combined with existing £4 million cash reserves, provides runway through most of 2026.
- Mont Royal Resources expects ASX listing providES immediate liquidity for investors. The merged entity will comprise approximately 190 million shares at an issue price of A$0.20 per share, with around A$10 million in cash following a heavily oversubscribed capital raising. This translates to a fully diluted market capitalisation of approximately $36 million and an enterprise value of $25 million. The immediate work program focuses on completing the PEA refresh, advancing metallurgical optimization, and progressing permitting and government engagement.
- NexMetals Mining has outlined an aggressive 2026 programme designed to deliver multiple value inflection points. Lekstrom states: "We're going to have two economic studies in 2026. We're going to have all the expansion work. We're going to use this money to show scale and size." The company expects to complete preliminary assessments on both Selebi and Selkirk, providing initial economic frameworks for each asset. With approximately US$90 million in cash after settling all outstanding obligations, management emphasizes full funding for the 2026 work programme.
- Impact Minerals plans to commission its pilot plant by year-end, pursue customer offtake agreements in 2026, and scale operations into North America by 2027, potentially including a NASDAQ listing.
- Asian Battery Metals is conducting detailed mineralogical work with final processing of massive sulphide samples expected to be completed while advancing regional exploration at the MS1 prospect and completing acquisition of the Maikhan Uul VMS copper-gold project.
The Investment Thesis for Critical Minerals
Government-Backed Development Reduces Financing Risk
- Canada's commitment of 1.5% GDP to critical mineral projects and Australia's $4 billion Critical Minerals Facility provide non-dilutive capital pathways that reduce traditional equity financing requirements
- Infrastructure support (roads, power, transmission) transforms economic viability of remote deposits by shifting capital burden from private developers to government strategic initiatives
- Major Project Status designations accelerate permitting timelines and provide access to export finance mechanisms unavailable to conventional mining projects
- Target companies with active government engagement (Mont Royal, Empire Metals, Canada Nickel) demonstrating concrete pathways to public funding rather than those relying solely on equity markets
Technical De-Risking Through Proven Metallurgy
- Focus on assets with completed metallurgical test work demonstrating commercial recovery rates (Asian Battery Metals: 89-95% copper recovery; Mont Royal: 35-37% rare earth concentrates)
- Third-party validation from major mining companies (BHP's selection of Asian Battery Metals for Xplor program) provides independent technical credibility
- Elimination of capital-intensive processing stages (Empire Metals' hydrometallurgical pathway bypassing smelting; NexMetals' concentrate-splitting eliminating $1+ billion smelter requirement) fundamentally improves project economics
- Avoid early-stage metallurgical stories without demonstrated flowsheets—the "graveyards full of rare earth hopeful companies" that failed on technical grounds
Strategic Timing Capitalizes on Supply Chain Disruption
- Industry restructuring creates market entry opportunities as established producers retreat (Rio Tinto's titanium review, Venator administration, Iluka suspensions)
- Western government and manufacturer engagement with projects (Boeing and U.S. Department of Defense conversations with Empire Metals) signals offtake potential before production
- EV demand growth (24% year-to-date through September 2025) and semiconductor expansion (AI data center requirements for HPA) provide sustained demand visibility
- Position in assets with 2-3 year development timelines to align production with peak demand growth rather than long-dated 5-10 year stories
Valuation Opportunities in Enterprise Value per Resource Ton
- Mont Royal's enterprise value of $25 million for nearly 200 million tons of rare earth resource represents compelling value on EV-per-ton basis compared to peer companies
- Impact Minerals' Lake Hope project contains estimated $15 billion of HPA with minimal drilling costs ($150,000) and 40-50 years mine life at current enterprise values
- Asian Battery Metals' A$30 million market cap with 800-meter strike length at Oval and multiple satellite targets provides leveraged exposure to discovery upside
- Evaluate projects on capital efficiency metrics—how much exploration expenditure (A$5-6 million at Asian Battery Metals' Oval) established what scale of mineralized footprint
Jurisdictional Advantages and Operating Cost Structures
- Stable democratic jurisdictions with established mining infrastructure (Botswana's 59-year democracy hosting MMG, Sandfire, De Beers; Mongolia's 20-30 new mines in 15 years) reduce political risk premiums
- Surface mining of friable material (Empire Metals: "No blasting, no drilling, no crushing, no grinding") eliminates conventional mining cost components
- Proximity to end markets reduces logistics complexity (Asian Battery Metals' Mongolia location at China's doorstep; Canada Nickel's Eastern Canada positioning for North American demand)
- Target projects with sub-$500 million capital intensity (NexMetals' dual assets each targeting this threshold) that enable financing through government support, offtakes, and conventional debt without massive equity dilution
Multiple Exit Pathways Beyond Traditional Production
- Dual-track strategies (NexMetals developing Selebi internally while potentially monetizing Selkirk through JV or sale) provide non-dilutive funding pathways
- Strategic transaction potential increases with government backing—projects receiving Major Project Status become acquisition targets for companies seeking subsidized production
- JV opportunities with downstream processors (Mont Royal's philosophy: "Junior mining companies shouldn't be going out there and trying to do everything themselves") de-risk development capital requirements
- Compressed development timelines (NexMetals' two-year strategic timeline versus typical 5-10 year junior mining cycles) create near-term liquidity events rather than indefinite capital calls
2026 Represents Peak Opportunity for Critical Minerals Investment
The critical minerals sector stands at an inflection point where government policy, supply chain vulnerabilities, and demand growth converge to create investment opportunities distinct from traditional resource cycles. Western governments have explicitly committed capital to secure domestic supply chains, infrastructure funding transforms project economics, and technical de-risking through proven metallurgy reduces development uncertainty. Companies demonstrating scale, strategic alignment with government priorities, and near-term catalysts are positioned to access multiple value creation pathways—from direct government financing to strategic transactions to accelerated development timelines. For investors, 2026 represents the period when government commitments translate to tangible project advancement, economic studies define valuations, and strategic partnerships crystallize, providing entry points before production decisions drive significant rerating. The combination of unprecedented government support, industry restructuring, and proven technical solutions creates a risk-reward profile favoring investors who identify quality assets with clear development pathways over those waiting for production certainty at substantially higher valuations.
Analyst's Notes




























