NYSE: CLOSED
TSE: CLOSED
LSE: CLOSED
HKE: CLOSED
NSE: CLOSED
BM&F: CLOSED
ASX: CLOSED
FWB: CLOSED
MOEX: CLOSED
JSE: CLOSED
DIFX: CLOSED
SSE: CLOSED
NZSX: CLOSED
TSX: CLOSED
SGX: CLOSED
NYSE: CLOSED
TSE: CLOSED
LSE: CLOSED
HKE: CLOSED
NSE: CLOSED
BM&F: CLOSED
ASX: CLOSED
FWB: CLOSED
MOEX: CLOSED
JSE: CLOSED
DIFX: CLOSED
SSE: CLOSED
NZSX: CLOSED
TSX: CLOSED
SGX: CLOSED

How Fund Managers Separate "Cheap" Mining Stocks from True Value Opportunities

Mining investment team reports strong portfolio performance, outlines value-focused strategy targeting turnarounds, discoveries, restarts ahead of conferences.

Derek Mcpherson (Executive Chair) and Sam Pelaez (President, CEO, and CIO) of Olive Resource Capital, in a comprehensive discussion share insights regarding their current portfolio performance and future investment strategy. The conversation provides insight into institutional approaches to junior mining investments, highlighting both defensive portfolio management and offensive opportunity identification ahead of major industry conferences.

Portfolio Performance Highlights

Derek and Sam reported significant positive developments across their core holdings, characterizing these updates as validation of their defensive investment thesis. Their largest portfolio position, Omai Gold Mines, delivered a substantial resource update that exceeded previous estimates, with the global resource now "well north of 5 million ounces" and maintaining grades "well north of a gram and a half." The team emphasized this represents a "global moon stage" asset from both metal endowment and processing perspectives.

This particular investment originated from a Beaver Creek conference decision two years prior, where the team identified that previous management issues had been resolved. The opportunity to acquire shares "sub 5 cents" presented itself shortly after, leading to the position becoming their largest holding as performance drove position size rather than continued purchasing.

Strategic Developments Across Holdings

Aurion Resources experienced a strategic investment from an undisclosed party, acquiring a 9.9% stake at approximately 80 cents per share while the stock traded near dollar levels. The duo interprets this development as positioning for potential merger and acquisition activity. However, they view the strategic investment's primary value as providing capital for aggressive drilling at the Kaaresselkä project, which they believe represents underappreciated value due to market distraction over M&A speculation.

Elemental Altus Royalty demonstrated the execution capabilities that attracted the team's initial investment. Following Tether's acquisition of just over 50% ownership, the royalty company made aggressive acquisitions in West Australia and Africa, essentially deploying their entire cash balance and credit facility. The team views this as validation of their thesis that the new ownership structure would enable more aggressive acquisition strategies, supported by a substantial shareholder base

Value-Oriented Investment Philosophy

Derek and Sam characterize their approach as fundamentally value-oriented, seeking assets trading below intrinsic worth due to market inefficiencies common in junior mining's small, specialized market. They distinguish between being "cheap" and being "undervalued," noting that many assets may appear inexpensive while representing value traps that fail to outperform broader markets.

Critical to their process is identifying management teams capable of closing valuation gaps through execution. This extends beyond established track records to include evaluation of structured plans spanning 12 to 36 months. As Sam noted: "If you were going to spend millions of dollars on drilling, you should already know what you're going to be asking. Obviously the results are going to inform what you do next, but you should already be thinking ahead."

The team explicitly avoids momentum-based investing, using Barrick Gold as an example of a large-cap name they've avoided despite underperformance relative to peers like Newmont and Agnico Eagle. They view the temptation to buy underperformers expecting mean reversion as a deviation from their value-focused approach. Conference dynamics also inform their contrarian perspective. Names heavily pitched at industry events often end up on their avoid list, with Derek recalling a PDAC experience where universal broker enthusiasm for a particular story immediately raised red flags. That company subsequently underperformed significantly.

Offensive Strategy Target Categories

Turnaround stories appeal to the team because markets typically require multiple quarters to recognize operational improvements, even in favorable commodity environments. Current gold price strength provides additional tailwinds that make operational fixes more achievable and create greater management flexibility. A second category focuses on cash-flow positive producers making significant discoveries. These situations offer advantages over pure exploration plays because existing operations can fund advancement without requiring equity raises that might dilute shareholders during exploration success.

Developers with discoveries represent another category, though typically less attractive than producing companies with similar finds. The exception involves exceptional discoveries that could prove transformational. Restart projects offer particular appeal when previous failures resulted from factors other than metal prices. These situations often involve assets acquired by new management teams who have identified and addressed fatal flaws in previous operations. Capital requirements typically remain modest compared to greenfield development, often requiring $100 million or less and potentially fundable through private placements rather than full project financing.

Conference Strategy Implementation

Derek and Sam emphasizes conferences' role in discovering overlooked opportunities despite comprehensive news wire coverage. Direct interactions often reveal stories that have escaped broader market attention, making conference attendance valuable beyond scheduled meetings. The upcoming Beaver Creek and Denver Gold Forum conferences represent critical opportunities for both validating current thesis work and identifying new investments. The team expects to evaluate five to ten companies in their target categories, ultimately investing in one or two while potentially discovering entirely new opportunities.

Discussion of Federal Reserve Chairman Powell's typical Denver Gold Forum timing suggests potential market catalysts. Historically, Powell's speeches during the conference have created negative sentiment, but the duo suggests current conditions might produce opposite effects given recent Jackson Hole commentary.

This institutional perspective on junior mining investment reveals a disciplined approach combining fundamental analysis with contrarian positioning. The team's success appears rooted in patient capital deployment, management quality assessment, and willingness to hold positions through extended development cycles. Their defensive strategy validation across multiple holdings demonstrates the importance of catalyst identification and timing in junior mining investments.

The offensive strategy's focus on operational improvements, discovery potential, and asset restart opportunities provides a framework for evaluating opportunities in a strengthening gold environment. However, their emphasis on avoiding momentum and crowded trades suggests continued market inefficiencies exist for disciplined investors willing to conduct thorough due diligence. For investors in junior mining sectors, this analysis highlights the critical importance of management evaluation, catalyst timing, and maintaining investment discipline despite market volatility and promotional activity common in the sector.

TL;DR

Olive Resource Capital's executives Derek Mcpherson and Sam Pelaez outlined their disciplined approach to junior mining investments, combining defensive portfolio management with offensive opportunity identification. Their largest holding, Omai Gold Mines, delivered exceptional results with resources exceeding 5 million ounces at high grades. The team focuses on value-oriented investing, avoiding momentum plays while targeting turnaround stories, cash-flow positive producers with discoveries, and restart projects. Their contrarian approach includes avoiding heavily promoted conference darlings, instead seeking overlooked opportunities through direct management interactions. Key success factors include rigorous management evaluation, catalyst timing, and maintaining investment discipline in a volatile sector prone to promotional activity.

FAQs (AI-Generated)

What makes Olive Resource Capital's investment approach different from other junior mining investors?Olive Resource Capital distinguishes itself through a strictly value-oriented approach that avoids momentum investing and heavily promoted stocks. They focus on identifying management teams capable of closing valuation gaps through execution, requiring structured 12-36 month plans from portfolio companies. Their contrarian strategy includes avoiding names that receive universal broker enthusiasm at conferences, instead seeking overlooked opportunities through direct interactions.

How does Olive Resource Capital evaluate junior mining management teams?The team goes beyond traditional track record evaluation to assess management's structured planning capabilities over 12-36 month periods. They look for leaders who demonstrate forward-thinking in drilling programs and operational decisions. As Sam Pelaez noted, quality management should already know what questions they're asking before spending millions on drilling, showing they're thinking multiple steps ahead in their development strategy.

What are the key investment categories that Olive Resource Capital targets?Olive Resource Capital focuses on four main categories: turnaround stories in favorable commodity environments, cash-flow positive producers making significant discoveries, developers with exceptional transformational discoveries, and restart projects where previous failures weren't due to metal prices. They particularly favor situations where new management teams have identified and addressed fatal flaws in previous operations.

Why does Olive Resource Capital avoid momentum-based investing in mining stocks?The team believes momentum investing deviates from their core value-focused approach and can lead to value traps. They use Barrick Gold as an example, avoiding it despite underperformance relative to peers like Newmont and Agnico Eagle, because they don't chase underperformers expecting mean reversion. Instead, they seek assets trading below intrinsic worth due to market inefficiencies in the specialized junior mining sector.

How important are mining conferences to Olive Resource Capital's investment strategy?Conferences play a crucial role in discovering overlooked opportunities that escape broader market attention despite comprehensive news coverage. The team attends events like Beaver Creek and Denver Gold Forum not just for scheduled meetings, but for serendipitous discoveries of new investment opportunities. However, they use a contrarian approach, often avoiding companies that receive heavy promotion at these events, viewing universal enthusiasm as a red flag.

Analyst's Notes

Institutional-grade mining analysis available for free. Access all of our "Analyst's Notes" series below.
View more

Subscribe to Our Channel

Subscribing to our YouTube channel, you'll be the first to hear about our exclusive interviews, and stay up-to-date with the latest news and insights.
Aurion Resources
Go to Company Profile
Elemental Altus Royalties
Go to Company Profile
Recommended
Latest

Stay Informed

Sign up for our FREE Monthly Newsletter, used by +45,000 investors